<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simulmedia Official Website &#187; Pravin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simulmedia.com/author/pravin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simulmedia.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Viewers Surf?</title>
		<link>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/why-do-viewers-surf/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-do-viewers-surf</link>
		<comments>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/why-do-viewers-surf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pravin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel surfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simulmedia.com/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody with a television and a remote control channel surfs.B Even the most directed viewer allocates some part of their hours in front of the television flipping through channels, lingering for several seconds on a program before returning to the guide, visiting their next favorite network or moving on to the adjacent channels on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody with a television and a remote control <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_surfing">channel surfs</a>.B  Even the most directed viewer allocates some part of their hours in front of the television flipping through channels, lingering for several seconds on a program before returning to the guide, visiting their next favorite network or moving on to the adjacent channels on the dial.</p>
<p>Channel surfing is essential to the television viewing experience, especially as the number of channels and the volume of programming on television explodes.B  Following from the explosion of television content, viewers&#8217; ability to discover new programs is impaired and their estimation of the opportunity costs of choosing a program is increased.</p>
<p>At Simulmedia, we think that certain viewers will spend less time surfing if they were better informed of program content and schedules.B  We also think that, through segmenting viewers by their surfing habits, we might better identify the viewers that will surf less and tune in more after exposure to the right program promotions. B Scheduling promotions in spots that index highly for viewers likely to enter favorable surfing modes will encourage their substituting viewing time for surfing time and increase the ratings of the programs they choose.</p>
<p>To investigate surfing behavior further we tapped into <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=channel%20surfing">data</a> from <a href="http://www.twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, where dozens of people announce to the world that they are channel surfing every day.B  Unlike traditional ratings or second-by-second set-top-box information, Twitter has rich qualitative information that reveals motivations behind viewers&#8217; surfing.</p>
<p>A semantic analysis of the data revealed that the <em>tweets</em> could be clustered into 8 distinct <em>channel surfing modes</em>. Each of these modes represents a different state-of-mind, which in turn could correspond to receptivity to program promotion. The modes are listed below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/channel-surfing.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-417" title="channel surfing tweets" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/channel-surfing.png" alt="channel surfing tweets" width="645" height="403" /></a></p>
<p><a name="OLE_LINK1"><strong>1. </strong><strong>Anticipation</strong> </a><strong>- </strong>composed of people who tweeted about surfing as they waited for a program to start. For example, &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=channel%20surfing%20waiting%20until%203pm%20when%20ellen%20comes%20on%21%u201D.%20%20"><em>channelB surfingB waiting until 3pm when ellen comes on!</em></a><em>&#8220;</em>.</p>
<p><strong>2.</strong> <strong>Searching &#8211; </strong>composed of people who indicated that they were searching for something to watch. For example &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Channel%20surfing%20.%20looking%20for%20some%20good%20cable%20tv"><em>ChannelB surfingB . looking for some good cable tv</em>&#8220;.</a></p>
<p><strong>3. </strong><strong>Multi-tasking &#8211; </strong>composed of people who were doing other things besides surfing and twittering. For example &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Channel%20surfing%20and%20reading%20Roenick%27s%20latest%20comments%20on%20how%20he%20thinks%20Babcock%20hates%20Cheli"><em>ChannelB surfingB and reading Roenick&#8217;s latest comments on how he thinks Babcock hates Cheli</em></a><em>..</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p><strong>4. </strong><strong>Split-attention </strong><strong>- </strong>composed of people who distribute their attention between several programs at once. For example &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Channel%20surfing%20between%20Idol%20and%20Lakers"><em>ChannelB surfingB between Idol and Lakers</em></a>&#8220;. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>5. </strong><strong>About to sleep -</strong><strong> composed</strong> of people who are just biding time by channel surfing before they fall asleep. For example &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=channel%20surfing%2C%20probably%20til%20I%20fall%20asleep"><em>channelB surfing, probably til I fall asleep</em></a><em>.&#8221;</em><strong>. </strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>6. </strong><strong>Relaxing </strong><strong>- </strong>composed of people who have indicated that they were in a relaxed state of mind and were channel surfing. For example &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Plans%20fell%20through%20so%20chillaxing%20n%20channel%20surfing"><em>Plans fell through so chillaxing nB channelB surfing</em></a>&#8220;.B  <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>7. </strong><strong>Bored &amp; Awake </strong><strong>- </strong>composed of insomniacs who are bored, and are surfing in the hope they fall asleep soon. For example <em>&#8220;</em><a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Channel%20surfing%20because%20I%20can%27t%20sleep"><em>ChannelB surfingB because I can&#8217;t sleep</em></a><em>&#8230;..&#8221;</em><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>8.</strong> <strong>Converts </strong><strong>- </strong>composed of people who found something to watch while surfing. For example, &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=Channel%20surfing%20and%20found%20last%2015%20mins%20"><em>ChannelB surfingB and found last 15 mins of Penn State trouncing Stanford in the Championship game in women&#8217;s college#rugbyB on ESPNU</em></a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d expect viewers in different modes to respond differently to program promotion.B  Of the eight surfing modes, Anticipation and Split-attention are likely the most difficult to sway with promotions.B  Viewers in Anticipation mode surf to kill time before a scheduled program.B  Viewers in the Split-attention mode are watching multiple channels at the same time.</p>
<p>On the other end of the discovery spectrum, we&#8217;d expect viewers in the Searching and Converting mode, roughly 30% of classified tweets, to be most likely to change their surfing time to watching time.B  Directing promotions to viewers who are in Searching and Converting modes presents a untapped opportunity to increase ratings and also provide better media choices to these viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/why-do-viewers-surf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Birds and Bubbles &#8211; What can Darwin teach us about TV?</title>
		<link>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/05/ofbirdsandbubbles/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ofbirdsandbubbles</link>
		<comments>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/05/ofbirdsandbubbles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pravin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience Acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience Attentiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simulmedia.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While visiting the Galapagos Islands Darwin came across thirteen species of finch &#8211; a small, sparrow-like bird. B Although they were similar in size, their biggest differentiating factors were the sizes and shapes of their beaks. Some finches had slender thin beaks, while others had thick strong beaks (see image) Darwin postulated that competition for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While visiting the Galapagos Islands Darwin came across thirteen species of finch &#8211; a small, sparrow-like bird. B Although they were similar in size, their biggest differentiating factors were the sizes and shapes of their beaks. Some finches had slender thin beaks, while others had thick strong beaks (see image)</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-360" title="finches" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/finches.png" alt="finches" width="246" height="235" /></p>
<p>Darwin postulated that competition for limited food resources led to the single finch population on the island to diverge into 13 different species. Each species adapted to specialize on a different food source &#8211; resulting in the evolution of different beak shapes that we see today.</p>
<p>At Simulmedia, we think that TV networks face similar pressures as they compete for a share of increasingly scarce audience attention.B  These pressures force networks to focus on attracting specific audiences.</p>
<p>We tested our hypothesis by adapting the <a href="../../../../../2009/04/322/">Audience Attentiveness framework</a> we introduced in an earlier post. B To recap, the Y-axis represents Attentiveness, measured as theB <em>average network minutes viewed during primetime per viewer</em>, the X-axis represents the Relative Segment Reach which is theB <em>percentage of audience </em>segmentB <em>viewing primetime on that network</em>, and the area of the bubbles represents the <em>number of total network primetime viewers within each segment</em>.</p>
<p>We predicted that broadcast networks should have programming that caters to a wide variety of audiences &#8211; intuitively, the only way they could maintain their large reach.B  As a result broadcast networks should have audiences distributed across all four quadrants of the Simulmedia Attentiveness chart.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-364" title="specialist-to-generalist" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/specialist-to-generalist.png" alt="specialist-to-generalist" width="654" height="103" /></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-369" title="network-segments" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/network-segments-276x1024.png" alt="network-segments" width="276" height="1024" /></p>
<p>Cable networks, like the finches, should show signs of specialization.B  We should see a small cluster of audiences with high attentiveness and high reach in the upper-right quadrant with the rest of the audiences clustering towards the center.B  Data was extracted for February 2009 by applying Simulmedia Audience SegmentsB) on the TNS InfosysTV system.</p>
<p>As predicted, the cable networks we sampled displayed various degrees of specialization (see charts below). Their charts showed a cluster of audiences separate from the others in the top-right quadrant.B  ESPN, as expected, with its exclusive focus on sports tends to be an extreme case of specialization as seen by the Basketball Fans.</p>
<p>Spike, although not as extreme as ESPN, tends to have relatively higher segment reach and attentiveness into the Remote Detective audiences; whereas for Discovery the core audiences are TV Naturalists and Reality Watchers.</p>
<p>Among the broadcast networks, while audiences interacted with NBC as predicted &#8211; relatively equal distribution across the four quadrants &#8211; CBS and ABC had remarkably different patterns. CBS and to a lesser extent ABC&#8217;s audiences aligned themselves almost perfectly in a straight line.</p>
<p>We think this indicates that CBS and ABC have adopted an audience acquisition strategy focused on niche audiences.B  Their attentiveness charts look somewhere between a traditional broadcast network and a cable network.B  This slight tilt towards specialization seems to have worked as <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/29/fox-ties-cbs-for-adults-25-54-likely-to-pass-before-seasons-end/17668">both have beat NBC (when one excludes the Super Bowl) in the ratings game</a>.</p>
<p>In conclusion, we think that TV Networks are adopting a range of audience acquisition strategies. B Cable networks continue to specialize on small niche audiences. Some such as ESPN are hyper-specialized focusing exclusively on sports audiences, whereas Discovery and Spike Cable networks show a lesser degree of specialization.B  Surprisingly, broadcast networks are also showing signs of specialization as illustrated by CBS and ABC; however others such as NBC continue to execute on the traditional model.</p>
<p>As for the finches, they continue to evolve 150 years after their discovery by Darwin. National Geographic <span style="color: #3366ff;"><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/07/060714-evolution.html">reports</a> </span>that &#8220;<em>Since the arrival of the Large Ground Finch in 1982 on the island of Daphne the Medium Ground Finch, a long-time Daphne resident has evolved to have a smaller beak-apparently as a result of direct competition with the larger bird for food.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Thoughts welcome&#8230;.</p>
<p><em>*Thanks to Jeff Storan and Stewart Hauser for their help with the data visualizations.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/05/ofbirdsandbubbles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audience Attentiveness</title>
		<link>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/04/322/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=322</link>
		<comments>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/04/322/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pravin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bubble chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simulmedia.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have varying degrees of affinity for different program genres.B Some prefer sitcoms; others prefer medical dramas.B At the same time, tapping the tremendous variety of available programming options, people tend to watch programs spanning genres. Basically, everybody is watching everything all the time.B People may be loyal to a few programs and sampling a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have varying degrees of affinity for different program genres.B  Some prefer sitcoms; others prefer medical dramas.B  At the same time, tapping the tremendous variety of available programming options, people tend to watch programs spanning genres.</p>
<p>Basically, everybody is watching everything all the time.B  People may be loyal to a few programs and sampling a broad range of other programs.B  It follows that the audience tuning in to any one program is a medley of audiences with diverse genre preferences.</p>
<p>Simulmedia has been working to understand this medley of audiences to the advantage of programmers interested in finding better and bigger audiences and to the benefit of viewers seeking content aligned with their preferences.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve developed a few tools to help us on our way:</p>
<ul>
<li>Genre Segmentation &#8211; We&#8217;ve defined audience segments who tuned in to similarly classified programs. For example, &#8220;Laughtrackers&#8221; are more likely than the average viewer to watch sitcoms. &#8220;Remote Detectives&#8221; prefer crime dramas.</li>
<li>Audience Program Consumption Bubble Chart &#8211; A data visualization plotting segments&#8217; relative reach and attentiveness to a selected program.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the example below, to understand how audiences allocate their attention to a show, we examine the interaction of twenty-one genre-based audiences with an hour long drama show on one of the major broadcast networks.</p>
<p>The Y-axis represents Attentiveness, measured as the <em>average minutes viewed per show per viewer</em>, the X-axis represents the Relative Segment Reach which is the <em>percentage of audience segment </em>that views the show, and the area of the bubbles represents the number of total viewers within each segment.</p>
<p>We think this tool is useful to refining the program&#8217;s promotional strategy.B  Through review of the Program Bubble Chart program marketers can learn which audiences represent the core and which might be engaged to increase their loyalty.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-321" title="bubble2" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bubble2.png" alt="bubble2" width="668" height="433" /></p>
<p>Analyzing the quadrants&#8230;</p>
<p>Top-Right Quadrant: The show has a high penetration and high attentiveness among the DIY&#8217;ers, Heartstringers, Song &amp; Dancers, Weekend Movie Watchers and Dramedy Devotees.B  These audiences watch most of the show and do not get distracted easily by shows aired during the same time.B  These audiences form the show&#8217;s core viewers.</p>
<p>Top-Left Quadrant: The show has a smaller following among Fake News Followers, Hecklers and Animated Grownups. These audiences are as attentive as show&#8217;s core viewers, and may be possible acquisition candidates as the show looks to expand its viewer base beyond its core.</p>
<p>Bottom-left quadrant: The show has smaller penetration in the TV Naturalists, Biography Buffs and Basketball Fans. Additionally as these audiences have low attentiveness they are at this show by accident or by channel surfing &#8211; and leave soon after they arrive.</p>
<p>Bottom-right quadrant: The show has high penetration into Thrill Seekers however they watch the show for a shorter period. This indicates that these audiences left the show after sampling it for a short while or were waiting for the next program to begin.</p>
<p>Thoughts, Questions, Comments welcome&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/04/322/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

