<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simulmedia Official Website &#187; Accenture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simulmedia.com/tag/accenture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simulmedia.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Reach Could Each Network Reach If Each Network Could Reach Good?</title>
		<link>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/08/how-much-reach/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-much-reach</link>
		<comments>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/08/how-much-reach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sandlot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simulmedia.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viewers who do not see an on-air promotion for a show will almost definitely not watch the show, and yet broadcast networks tend to reach far less than 100% of potential viewers.B As the Fall 2009 season approaches, network marketers should always be in the market for more reach.B In less than a month, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewers who do not see an on-air promotion for a show <a href="http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/07/yes-on-air-promotions-work/">will almost definitely not watch the show</a>, and yet broadcast networks tend to reach far less than 100% of potential viewers.B  As the Fall 2009 season approaches, network marketers should always be in the market for more reach.B</p>
<p>In less than a month, the broadcast networks will roll out their new shows for Fall 2009 season.B  Among them are NBCb s <em>Mercy</em>, ABCb s <em>Flash Forward</em>, CBSb s <em>The Good Wife</em>, FOXb s <em>Glee</em>, and the CWb s <em>Melrose Place</em>.B  With new shows comes the barrage of promotion, via television, radio, online ads, outdoor billboards, and within magazines/newspapers.B B  Resistance is futile.B  Thou shall not escape the networksb  attempts to help you b learnb  about these new shows.B B  Or maybe, just maybe, thou have.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, Accenture released its Global Broadcast Consumer Survey titled b <a href="http://www.accenture.com/Global/Research_and_Insights/By_Industry/Media_and_Entertainment/Broadcast/2009ConsumerBroadcast.htm">Television: Entering the Era of Mass Fragmentation</a>b .B B  The report highlights the ways in which consumers learn about new television content.B  Of those polled, ads/promos garnered the highest response representing 40% of the group, followed by channel surfing (33%), and friends/family (30%).B  More recent methods such as blogs, web content stores, mobile ads, and DVR/PVR recommendations were towards the end of the pack with 8%, 6%, 5%, and 2% respectively.B</p>
<p>In view of this Accentureb s survey results, it would seem that networks canb t afford to not reach all potential television viewers when it comes to on-air promotion.B B  That is, however, exactly what is happening.B</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-664" href="http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/08/how-much-reach/fall2009/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-664" title="Fall2009" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Fall2009.png" alt="Fall2009" width="418" height="381" /></a></p>
<p><em>Note: Data from TNS Media Researchb s Charter LA.B  Time period: 2008-2009 episodes of the showb s most recently completed season.</em></p>
<p>B The table shows that less than half of potential viewers have been reached with an on-air promotion for any networkb s new program.B  These numbers will improve as the season approaches and finally begins, but as the following chart shows, even last season there was still a large population of viewers that had not seen a single promotion.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-667" href="http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/08/how-much-reach/fall2008/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-667" title="Fall2008" src="http://www.simulmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Fall2008.png" alt="Fall2008" width="386" height="395" /></a></p>
<p><em>Note: Data from TNS Media Researchb s Charter LA.B  Time period: 2008-2009 episodes of the showb s most recently completed season.</em></p>
<p>Marketers are not reaching a large portion of the television viewing audience.B  That a sizeable percentage of the potential audience does not see a promotion creates a downward spiral.B  If you donb t see a promotion, chances are you wonb t know about the program.B  If you donb t know about the program, then you canb t watch it.B  And if you donb t watch it, then ratings might decrease.B</p>
<p>The solution to this problem is simple.B  Networks must increase their promotional reach prior to program launch and maintain it during the program season.B</p>
<p>A conversation from <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108037/">The Sandlot (1993)</a></em> humorously illustrates the point of this issue, showing that people canb t consume something they know nothing about. B</p>
<p>Ham Porter: Hey, Smalls, you wanna s&#8217;more?</p>
<p>Smalls: Some more of what?</p>
<p>Ham Porter: No, do you wanna s&#8217;more?</p>
<p>Smalls: I haven&#8217;t had anything yet, so how can I have some more of nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/08/how-much-reach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Won&#039;t Solve TV&#039;s Content Discovery Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/search-wont-solve-tvs-content-discovery-problem/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=search-wont-solve-tvs-content-discovery-problem</link>
		<comments>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/search-wont-solve-tvs-content-discovery-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnlineSPIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVGuide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simulmedia.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, search is not going to be the silver bullet for television the way it was for online services. As we all know, television has a big problem with content discovery. According to The Accenture Global Broadcast Consumer Survey 2009, television viewers &#8220;face a significant bottleneck in discovering content that they like but have not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Nope, search is not going to be the silver bullet for television the way it was for online services. As we all know, television has a big problem with content discovery. According to <em><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'">The Accenture Global Broadcast Consumer Survey 2009</span></em>, television viewers &#8220;face a significant bottleneck in discovering content that they like but have not seen before.&#8221; The report goes on to state that &#8220;the proliferation of content options across devices is overwhelming to consumers.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Anyone who watches television today knows this to be true. And, anyone who sells or buys television advertising knows that the resulting audience fragmentation is a really big and growing problem &#8212; one that threatens the ad-supported foundation of the industry.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Today, it is virtually impossible for the majority of television viewers to be actually aware of the program choices available to them at any one time. The explosion of new channels, programs, platforms, devices, content choices and ways to view video at home has seen to that. In the old days, tools like <em><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'">TV Guide</span></em>, TV listings in the newspaper, and &#8220;lead-in, lead-out&#8221; on-air program promos provided all of the information and navigation guidance that viewers needed. Then, their choices could be counted on the ten fingers of their hands. No more. Those tools, and even their online equivalents, have not been able to keep pace with the volume and diversity of television viewing choices available today. Certainly, we have electronic programming guides today but, according to Accenture, even those are only relied upon by a minority of viewers. I don&#8217;t know about you, but I myself find programming guides clunky to use and the information in them to be quite flat.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">How to fix this? Should we just wait for someone to invent a new version of search for television, and solve this like we solved the problem online? I don&#8217;t think so. Here is why:</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Video, not text.</span></strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt"> Search works great for text, but not very well for video. Television is all about video. Over time, more robust video searching will be devloped, but I don&#8217;t imagine that changing drastically over the next couple of years.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Little robust interactivity</span></strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">. Search works online because the primary interface to computers is a keyboard. Not so with TV. While remotes are getting more robust and cable TV infrastructure is getting smarter and more interactive, most Americans are not going to be typing search queries on their remote controls any time soon. Yes, I do imagine that smartphones may become remote controls themselves, I don&#8217;t imagine that happening in a majority of American homes for many years.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">Entertainment-driven, lean-back usage.</span></strong><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt"> Using online services on computers is primarily a utility-driven, &#8220;lean-forward&#8221; activity. Watching video on a television is primarily an entertainment-driven, &#8220;lean-back&#8221; activity. Search is very powerful in a utility-driven environment. It is not nearly as powerful in an entertainment one. </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">I think that this problem is going to be solved incrementally, with solutions built on top of &#8212; or among &#8212; existing tools. Like Accenture, I think that enhancing on-air program promotion with data-driven recommendations and targeting will make a big difference (I am biased here, of course, since that is the path my new company is pursuing). </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">I also think that we will see social media play a very big role. Word-of-mouth is critical to television viewing choices and the proliferation of smartphones and mobile computing means more and more viewers will also be tethered to the Internet while they watch TV. Finally, I believe that online program listings will get better, and become more personal. These two will benefit from the dual usage of TV and online services.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt">However, I don&#8217;t think that when we turn our TVs on, the first thing we will see is a search box. That future I don&#8217;t believe in. How about you?</span></p>
<p>(This post originally ran on MediaPostb s Online Spin on June 11th, 2009.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simulmedia.com/2009/06/search-wont-solve-tvs-content-discovery-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

